A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web-site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated national consideration following an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental issues, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier plus the Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has evolved into a really publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design functions at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, request to develop their relatives house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining made by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their arranging authorization by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result locations are issue to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably within a delicate coastal natural environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, that's partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their see, an allegation that's been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, where by views of The ocean are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, according to sworn proof referenced within the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-large water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions, an image which includes given that turn into emblematic with the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were being meant to Get visual evidence from the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how the two Adult men entered the h2o during significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Just about the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of steps have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as audience sought to know the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders must be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment during the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be described as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed according to Specialist information and authorized programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how setting Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament a large number of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite distinct Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much approach.
As being the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nonetheless the human ingredient remains central: neighbours who need to live together with each other extensive following the legal costs have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can in the long run be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.